Analog vs. Digital Sensors: Which Type is Right for You?

In industrial automation, sensors are the foundational sense organs. They provide the critical data on temperature, pressure, position, level, and flow that control systems rely on to make decisions. When selecting a sensor, one of the most fundamental choices an engineer faces is between analog and digital technology. This isn’t just a technical nuance; it’s a decision that impacts system cost, complexity, performance, and future scalability.

Understanding the core differences, advantages, and disadvantages of each is key to designing an efficient and robust automation system.

Read more: Analog vs. Digital Sensors: Which Type is Right for You?

Digital vs Analog: What’s the Difference?

To even begin figuring out which type of sensor fits your needs best, it’s important to know fundamentally what each type of sensors are and how they differentiate from one another. Understanding and differentiating the differences in critical to an engineer because it affects factors like performance, overall cost, and longevity.

The main difference between both types of sensors is how they communicate the data they measure.

Analog sensors produce a continuous signal that directly represents the physical parameter being measured. This signal is typically a voltage (e.g., 0-10V) or a current (e.g., 4-20 mA, the industry standard for its noise immunity). As the physical property changes, the output signal changes proportionally and smoothly.

In contrast, digital sensors output discrete, binary values (a series of 1s and 0s). The measurement is converted into a digital number within the sensor itself. Communication doesn’t happen with a varying voltage level, but through a specific protocol or network.

Weighing the Options

When looking at options, it’s important to weigh the pro’s and cons of both Analog vs Digital to figure out which one fits your needs the best. Some examples of advantages and disadvantages are listed below.

Analogue

Pros

The biggest advantage that Analogue sensors have are that they are more simple in their design which translates to being cheaper on the front end. Another advantage is that in general there’s a wider range of compatibility as most PLC’s have an analog input built into them. Finally, because they have a continuous representation of measured value, they have a near infinite resolution for higher definition.

Cons

Of course there is a downside to using analogue sensors. The biggest disadvantage they have is that they are very limited in what only being able to transfer their primary data. The user wouldn’t be able to retrieve other data such as “sensor status” or “model number”. This goes into another big disadvantage that analogue sensors have. Outside of basic fault codes, analogue sensors can’t give an accurate diagnostic to the user. This means that operations have to be halted while they troubleshoot the fault code.


Digital

Pros

The biggest strength for digital sensors are their ability to quickly and accurately diagnose and problems within systems. Digital sensors can dynamically track the state of an operation and send reports to the operator in real time. This means that down time is significantly lessened resulting in more money saved in the long run. The abundance of information from digital is the other big advantage, not only are all sorts of data available the operator, but the data can also be scaled and adjusted as well. The operator can easily set ranges and parameters for the sensors to operate all from one location.

Cons

One of the biggest downsides for digital sensors is their complexity. Installing digital sensors requires a comprehensible knowledge of industrial networks and communication protocols. If the acronyms MQTT, TCP/IP, and HTTP sound foreign to you, then you understand the specialization needed to be able operate equipment using these sorts of communication protocols. While we’re on the topic of communication, digital sensors takes a system from being just a bunch of gears and metal, to being a sophisticated operation. With the modern advancement of connectivity, systems can internally and externally communicate via networks or the internet. While this is a valuable asset in regards to speed and efficiency, it creates a big risk when it comes to security.

Of course we can’t talk about a complex system without talking about another key feature that often comes with complexity. Cost. Things that are complex and require specialized skills sets will always be more expensive on the front end.

Choosing the Right Sensor

So now that we’ve gone over the pros and cons of each type of sensor, we can discuss which ones is right for what job. When trying to choose the right sensor it’s best to ask yourself a variety of questions.

Is your setup a simple vs complex? Is cost the biggest driver? Are you going completely new or upgrading/expanding existing infrastructure? How important is scalability for future development? Is noise a big deal? How detailed and accurate does your system need to be?

These are all valid questions that play a pivotal part in the deciding what type of sensor system you ultimately go with.


Conclusion

The evolution from analog to digital in industrial sensors mirrors the broader shift in technology. While analog sensors remain a reliable and cost-effective solution for straightforward applications, digital sensors are unequivocally the future. They offer the intelligence, resilience, and data richness required for modern, connected, and efficient industrial operations.

When making your selection, look beyond the initial purchase price. Consider the total cost of ownership, including installation, troubleshooting, downtime, and the immense value of the data that a digital sensor can provide. For any new installation where reliability, diagnostics, and data are priorities, the digital path is the clear and recommended choice.


Looking for a Sensor?

Let our team of experts get you connected with a sensor setup that will fit your needs perfectly.

Updated on December 17, 2025 by Ken Cheng

A header image for a blog about the most popular Lego set in every U.S. state.

 The Most Popular Lego Set in Every State

Whether you’re building sprawling starships or intricate architectural replicas, Lego sets have become a go-to creative escape for builders of all ages. At MRO Electric, we’re builders and problem-solvers at heart, so we were curious which sets were capturing the most attention nationwide. To find out, we analyzed Google Trends search data from the past 12 months, comparing interest levels for the 50 best-selling Lego sets across all 50 states. 

The results reveal a colorful mix of fan-favorite franchises and ambitious display pieces that continue to spark imagination years after their initial release. Whether residents gravitated toward massive builds like the Eiffel Tower or pop-culture favorites like the Millennium Falcon, every state had a standout Lego set that captured its interest.

Each State’s Top-Searched Lego Set

A map of the U.S. showing the most popular Lego set in each state.

Across the country, regional preferences reveal clear patterns in the types of Lego sets Americans most often searched for. Star Wars emerged as a major force in many western and southwestern states, with searches centering on iconic builds like the Lego Millennium Falcon and the Lego Death Star. Sets like Cloud City also stood out, showing the franchise’s widespread appeal in states with large fan conventions and strong sci-fi communities.

In contrast, the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions showed a strong affinity for the Lego Architecture line, with many states in these regions favoring builds like the Lego Eiffel Tower and the Lego Colosseum. This regional cluster suggests an appreciation for large-scale display pieces, particularly in states where urban centers and design-focused culture may inspire interest in detailed architectural models.

Meanwhile, Harry Potter maintained a devoted following in pockets across the country. Fans in Colorado, Minnesota, and New Hampshire searched most for the Lego Hogwarts Express, while Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Utah showed a strong preference for the Lego Hogwarts Castle. Maine leaned toward the Lego Hogsmeade Village, highlighting how different chapters of the franchise resonate uniquely with local fans.

The South displayed some of the most varied interests. Alabama favored the Lego Disney Castle, while Arkansas and Kentucky gravitated toward the whimsical Lego Pixar “Up” House. Mississippi and West Virginia stood out for their searches for the Lego Beauty and the Beast Castle, adding to Disney’s strong footprint in the region.

A few states chose clear outliers: Idaho residents searched most for the iconic Lego Bonsai Tree, part of the Botanical Collection, while Vermont favored the Lego Mario & Standard Kart set. North Dakota stood alone in favor of the Lego Titanic set, and both Hawaii and Nebraska showed the most interest in Lego Captain Jack Sparrow’s Pirate Ship, a standout favorite within the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise.

A table showing the most popular Lego sets nationally, their corresponding franchise/film, and the number of states that search the most for each.

The most popular Lego sets in the U.S., overall, are:

  • Lego Eiffel Tower — Lego Architecture: topped 9 states
  • Lego Millennium Falcon — Star Wars: 4 states
  • Lego Colosseum —  Lego Architecture: 3 states
  • Lego Hogwarts Castle — Harry Potter: 3 states
  • Lego Hogwarts Express — Harry Potter: 3 states
  • Lego Taj Mahal — Lego Architecture: 3 states

The clear nationwide favorite is the Lego Eiffel Tower, released in 2022, which ranked as the most-searched set in nine states, the highest total of any build in the dataset. As one of Lego’s tallest and most intricate display pieces (and with a retail price of $629.99), its popularity reflects the growing demand for large, architecturally inspired sets that double as décor.

In second place is the iconic Lego Millennium Falcon from Star Wars, the top search in four states. A longtime favorite among collectors, this flagship remains one of Lego’s most recognizable sets and one of its priciest, with the UCS version retailing at $849.99. Lego has released several versions of the Millennium Falcon set since 2000.

Just behind it are four sets tied for third place: the Lego Colosseum, Lego Hogwarts Castle ($469.99), Lego Hogwarts Express, and Lego Taj Mahal, each leading searches in three states. These builds blend fantasy and real-world landmarks, showing how both imaginative worlds and historical icons capture builders’ attention.

Rounding out the list are seven sets tied for fourth place, each topping searches in two states. These include Disney favorites like the Lego Beauty and the Beast Castle and the Lego Pixar “Up” House, Star Wars builds such as Lego Cloud City, Lego Death Star, and Lego X-Wing Starfighter, as well as standouts like Lego Rivendell and Lego Captain Jack Sparrow’s Pirate Ship.

Closing Thoughts

Whether it’s the architectural precision of the Eiffel Tower, the cinematic nostalgia of the Death Star, or the cozy charm of the house from Pixar’s “Up,” Americans gravitate toward sets that reflect their imaginations, interests, and sense of escape.

And just as Lego builders rely on sturdy foundations and precise engineering to bring their creations to life, manufacturers and engineers depend on reliable systems to keep their operations running. At MRO Electric, we help ensure those systems stay strong by repairing and supplying high-quality industrial automation components — including drives, PLCs, HMIs, and more — from trusted brands featured in our full product catalog. If you’re ready to strengthen your system’s performance, contact us today.

Methodology

We identified each state’s most popular Lego set by analyzing Google Trends search data from the past 12 months across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Using a list of 50 of the most-owned and best-selling Lego sets, we compared search interest for each and selected the set with the highest relative search volume in each state. 

Sources Used to Compile Lego Set Search Terms:

Fair Use

You are welcome to use, reference, and share non-commercial excerpts of this study with proper attribution. If you cite or cover our findings, please link back to this page so readers can view the full methodology, charts, and context.

Updated on December 8, 2025 by Leanna Cota